Daji Satyawan Shelake and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCABA/1606/2014
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
This court corrected the crime number and charged sections in the minutes of an anticipatory bail application. The order rectified clerical errors in the record without resolving the substantive bail application.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
903-aba-1606-2014
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
¶3
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1606 OF 2014
¶4
Daji Satyawan Shelake
and Another ...Applicants
vs.
¶5
State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
¶6
Mr. Jaydeep Mane, Advocate for the Applicants
Mrs. R.A. Ambekar, APP for the State.
¶7
CORAM : P.D. KODE, J.
¶8
DATE : DECEMBER 24, 2014
¶9
P.C.
¶10
. The application is made for speaking to
¶11
the minutes in the order dated 18122014.
¶12
2.It is submitted that the crime number and
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Daji Satyawan Shelake
- respondent
State of Maharashtra
Coram
AI extract
P.D. KODE
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court