Oracle judgment on non-appearance grounds. Wipro Finance Ltd. sued GSL India Ltd. Neither party appeared at two successive hearings. The court dismissed the suit under Order IX Rule 3 CPC and vacated any interim relief.
Suit dismissed. All interim/ad‑interim reliefs, if any, vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
6-S-5848-98.DOC
Shephali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 5848 OF 1998
Wipro Finance Ltd.
Versus
GSL India Ltd.
…Plaintiffs
…Defendants
None for the Plaintiffs.
None for the Defendants.
CORAM:G.S. PATEL, J
DATED:June 19, 2014
PC:-
1.The suit was listed last week when, too, none appeared for
the plaintiffs. It was stood over today. Once again none appears for
the plaintiffs.
2.A notice has been issued on the printed board, as also on the
High Court Website, to the effect that, when a suit listed,
irrespective of the caption under which it appears, if none appears
for the plaintiff/s when the matter is called out, the suit will be
dismissed.
1 of 2
6-S-5848-98.DOC
3.The names of the plaintiffs and their Advocates are correctly
shown. None appears when the matter is called out. The suit is
dismissed under Order IX Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure,
1908. Interim / ad-interim relief, if any, granted earlier in any
interlocutory proceedings in this suit, shall stand vacated forthwith.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a suit should be dismissed for non-appearance of the plaintiff.
What happens to interim reliefs granted in a dismissed suit.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Wipro Finance Ltd.
GSL India Ltd.
G.S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court