Dismissed

Asia Television Network and Anr. v. K.K.Modi Investment and Financial Pvt.Ltd. and Ors.

Bombay HC18 Jun 2014S/5299/1999

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Bombay dismissed Suit No. 5299 of 1999, filed by Asia Television Network against K.K. Modi Investment, due to the non-appearance of the plaintiff's representatives when the matter was called, invoking Order IX Rule 3 CPC.

What did the court decide?

The suit was dismissed with vacating of any interim relief granted earlier.

Asia Television Network and Anr. Vs K.K.Modi… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2014)

¶1

10-S5299-99.DOC

¶2

agk

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 5299 OF 1999

¶4

Asia Television Network & Another…Plaintiffs

¶5

Versus

¶6

K.K. Modi Investment & Financial Pvt. Limited …Defendants
and others

¶7

None for the Plaintiffs.
None for the Defendants.

¶8

CORAM:G.S. PATEL, J
DATED:June 18, 2014

¶9

PC:-

¶10

1.A notice has been issued on the printed board, as also on the
High Court Website, to the effect that, when a suit listed,
irrespective of the caption under which it appears, if none appears
for the plaintiff/s when the matter is called out, the suit will be
dismissed.

¶11

2.The names of the plaintiffs and their Advocates are correctly
shown. None appears when the matter is called out. The suit is
dismissed under Order IX Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure,

¶12

1 of 2

¶13

10-S5299-99.DOC

¶14

1908. Interim / ad-interim relief, if any, granted earlier in any
interlocutory proceedings in this suit, shall stand vacated forthwith.

¶15

(G. S. PATEL, J.)

¶16

2 of 2

Asia Television Network and Anr. v. K.K.Modi Investment and Financial Pvt.Ltd. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Asia Television Network and Anr. v. K.K.Modi Investment and Financial Pvt.Ltd. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jaitoon Abdul Karim Allaudin and Ors. Vs Elias Abdul Karim Allaudin and Ors.

Madhookar Ghanshyam Pavaskar Vs Subhash Sakharam Tanavade

Morarjee Goculdas Spinning and Seaving Co.Ltd Vs Sree Kailash Sugars and Chemicals Ltd.

Phonographic Performance Ltd. Vs Entertainment Network (India) Ltd. and Ors.

Phonographic Performance Ltd. Vs Entertainment Network India Ltd. and Ors.

Kavi Jumani Vs Shri Raaghavendra Movie Corpn. and Anr.