The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissed the suit for non-prosecution under Order IX Rule 8 CPC as neither party appeared.
Suit dismissed for non-prosecution under Order IX Rule 8 CPC.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
19-S144-99.DOC
agk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 144 OF 1999
Alpic Finance Limited
Versus
Rajinder Pipes Limited & Another
…Plaintiffs
…Defendants
None for the Plaintiffs.
None for the Defendants.
CORAM:G.S. PATEL, J
DATED:June 19, 2014
PC:-
1.The plaintiff – company is in liquidation. I have informed the
representative of the Official Liquidator to check all matters in
which this company is either a plaintiff or a defendant and to take
necessary steps. I did so several weeks ago before the summer
vacation. Nothing has been done in the matter.
2.None appears for the plaintiffs. None appears for the
defendants. The suit is dismissed for non-prosecution under Order
IX Rule 8 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the suit should be dismissed for non-prosecution.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
G. S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court