Disposed
Madhookar Ghanshyam Pavaskar v. Subhash Sakharam Tanavade
Bombay HCTS/116/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
P-3-TS-116-13-TP-983-08.DOC
Sharayu.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 116 OF 2013
IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 983 OF 2008
Madhookar G. Pavaskar…Plaintif
Versus
Satish S. Tanavade & Ors.…Defendants
Mr. M.A. Dudhane, for the Plaintiff.
Mr. E.A. Menezes, for the Defendants.
CORAM:G.S. PATEL, J
DATED:10th April 2015
PC:-
1. Not on board. Mentioned. By consent taken on board.
2. The Suit was decreed by an order dated 17th June 2014. Drawn up decree dispensed with. All concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this order.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
1 of 1
G. S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court