Dismissed
Bhagwanrao Ananrao Salunkhe and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Bombay HCWP/969/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CWP-969.12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
CRIMINALWRIT PETITION NO. 969 OF 2012
BHAGWANRAO ANANDRAO SALUNKHE & ANR.
.. PETITIONERS
VERSUS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR... RESPONDENTS
Mr. Ashok T. Gade, Advocate for the petitoiners Mrs. R. V. Newton, APP for the State Mr. D.R. Mane for Bahujan Shikshan Prasarak Manda – R. No. 2, appearing in person.
CORAM:-ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J. DATED : 04/07/2013
P.C.
The learned counsel for the petitioners states that, he has instructions to withdraw the petition. Costs imposed on the last date of hearing are reportedly paid. 2. The petition is allowed to be withdrawn and stands dismissed as such. No order as to costs.
(ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J.)
md.saleem
1/1
BHAGWANRAO ANANDRAO SALUNKHE & ANR
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR
ABHAY M. THIPSAY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court