Satyavrat Arjun Kale v. Anil Sambhaji Mane and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
In a criminal application for bail cancellation, the Bombay High Court dismissed the applicant's prayer. Instead of cancelling bail, it imposed stricter reporting conditions on respondents on behalf complainant claims of bail misuse.
What did the court decide?
Application rejected; respondents directed to report to police station every Monday and Thursday.
What the court decided
1
APPLN=242.12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 242 OF 2012
SATYAVRAT ARJUN KALE
.. APPLICANT
VERSUS
ANIL SAMBHAJI MANE & ORS.
.. RESPONDENTS
Mr. Prashant Hagare, Advocate for the applicant Mr. Vikram Chavan, Advocate for R. Nos. 1 to 3. Mrs. R. V. Newton, APP for the State
CORAM:-ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J. DATED : 04/07/2013
P.C.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail granted to respondents accused under Section 307 IPC should be cancelled.
Whether new reporting conditions should be imposed on respondents already on bail.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
SATYAVRAT ARJUN KALE
- respondent
ANIL SAMBHAJI MANE
Coram
ABHAY M. THIPSAY
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court