The High Court at Bombay Bench Aurangabad dismissed three writ petitions abated due to death of three respondents in a joint possession application that was not divisible.
Writ petitions dismissed as abated. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.439 OF 1992 WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.446 OF 1992
WRIT PETITION NO.447 OF 1992
Office Notes, Office
Memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court's
orders or directions
andRegistrar's
orders.
Court's or Judge's orders
Mr.S.S.Kulkarni, advocate holding for Mr.S.D.Kulkarni,
advocate for the petitioners.
Mr.P.R.Patil, advocate for Respondent Nos.1 to 9 in
W.P.Nos.439 and 446 of 1992 and for Respondent No.4 in
W.P.No.447 of 1992.
CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.
Date : 04.01.2013.
PER COURT :
possession. The said application was rejected by the Courts below. The possession was sought jointly from all the Respondents. As three Respondents i.e. Respondent Nos.3,4 and 8 are dead, the petitions abate against them. As the possession sought was joint and the same is not divisible, the whole petition would stand abated.
2
(S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.)
Dt.04.01.2013. asp/office/wp439.92
S.D.Kulkarni
Respondents 1-9
S.V.GANGAPURWALA
J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court