Petitioner challenged a landlord-tenant dispute governed by the Bombay Rent Act. The respondent had earlier executed a sale deed in favour of the petitioner. The court held the sale deed discharges the original suit.
Writ petition disposed of; rule discharged; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 W.P. 2415.1991
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 2415 OF 1991
Ramchandra Hari Patil V/s Rambhau Deoram Patil
Office Notes,Office Court's or Judge's orders Memoranda of Coram,appearances, ................................ Court's orders or CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J. directions and Registrar's orders DATE : 03/01/2013.
Mr. R.L.Kute, Advocate for the Petitioner.
PER COURT :
2 W.P. 2415.1991
in favour of the petitioner by the respondent, the parties would be governed by the said sale deed and the decree passed would no longer remain to be executable.
[ S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] KNP/W.P. 2415.1991
Ramchandra Hari Patil
Rambhau Deoram Patil
S.V. GANGAPURWALA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
