The petitioner failed to appear. The High Court dismissed the writ petition in default.
Writ petition dismissed in default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 3308 OF 1991
Arjun Dasharath & Ors. V/s Smt. Zoharabee W/o Mohd. Yousuf & Ors.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court’s or Judge’s orders Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. directions and DATE : 03/01/2013 Registrar’s orders
Mr. S.R.Deshpande, Advocate for Resp. Nos. 1/1 to 1/ 4.
PER COURT :
[ S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] KNP/W.P. 3308.1991
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be dismissed in default despite the petitioner's non-appearance.
Arjun Dasharath & Ors.
Smt. Zoharabee W/o Mohd. Yousuf & Ors.
S. V. Gangapurwala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
