A writ petition seeking leave to withdraw was allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of as withdrawn without substantive adjudication.
Writ Petition allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
29.wp.3275.12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3275 OF 2012
Yogesh Gotiram Patil & Ors. ... Petitioners Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents
Mr.Sachin Kudalkar i/b Madekar & Co. for Petitioners.
Mr.C.R.Sonawane, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 & 5.
Mr.A.M.Joshi i/b Maniar Srivastava Associates for Respondent Nos.2 to 4.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE & K. R. SHRIRAM, JJ.
DATE : JULY 16, 2013.
P.C.
The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the Petition. Writ Petition is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of as withdrawn.
[K. R. SHRIRAM, J.] [V. M. KANADE, J.]
1 / 2
29.wp.3275.12
Shraddha Talekar
2 / 2
Yogesh Gotiram Patil & Ors.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
V. M. Kanade
K. R. Shriram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
