This order disposes a writ petition following the petitioner's satisfaction with a statement by the Respondent No.2 that requisite action would be taken within four weeks.
None. The petition was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP-2611.13
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
WRIT PETITION NO. 2611 OF 2013
Suhas Raybhan Abhang and others Petitioners vs The State of Maharashtra and another Respondents
Shri V.D. Sapkal, Advocate for Petitioners Shri R.P. Phatke, AGP for Respondent No.1 Shri S.V. Gundre, Advocate holding for Shri V.D. Gunale, Adv. for Respondent No.2
CORAM : A. H. JOSHI AND SUNIL P. DESHMUKH,JJ. DATE : JULY 10, 2013
ORDER
(SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.) (A. H. JOSHI, J.)
pnd
Suhas Raybhan Abhang and others
The State of Maharashtra
another
A. H. JOSHI
SUNIL P. DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
