The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench allowed this writ petition to be disposed of as withdrawn upon the petitioner's instruction. No substantive legal issues were considered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.4877/2013
drp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.4877 OF 2013
Sanjay Kerba Telalwar
PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & others RESPONDENTS
.......
Mr. V.D.Gunale, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. V.D.Rakh, AGP for respondent State
Mr. V.S.Panpatte, Advocate for respondent No.4
.......
[CORAM : A. H. JOSHI AND
SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.J.]
DATE : 9th JULY 2013
ORDER:
1.Leaned advocate for petitioner states that
he has instructions from the petitioner to withdraw
the petition. Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
[SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.] [A. H. JOSHI, J.]
drp/A13/wp4877-13
Sanjay Kerba Telalwar
The State of Maharashtra
A. H. JOSHI
SUNIL P. DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court