The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad disposed of a criminal writ petition concerning representations addressed to the Collector and Forest Department regarding the petitioner's rights without adjudicating on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp152.13
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 152 OF 2013
Narayan Mahadev Yadav ...Petitioner
versus
The State of Maharashtra and another
...Respondents
Mr. M.L. Dharashive, advocate for the petitioner Mr. S.G. Nandedkar, A.P.P. for respondents
CORAM : K. U. CHANDIWAL AND A. I. S. CHEEMA, JJ. DATED : 4th SEPTEMBER, 2013
PER COURT :-
rlj/
wp152.13
-2-
Narayan Mahadev Yadav
The State of Maharashtra
K. U. CHANDIWAL
A. I. S. CHEEMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
