The applicant withdrew Criminal Application No.173/2011. The High Court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the application as withdrawn.
Permitted to be withdrawn and dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
I N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.173/2011
( Laxman Sadashiv Savai Vs. The State of Mah.& Ors./Anr.)
Office Notes, office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court’s orders
Court’s or Judge’s orders.
or Directions and Registrar’s orders
Mr. AN Nagargoje, Advocate for applicant;
Mr.SG Nandedkar, APP for State.
CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL &
A.I.S.CHEEMA,JJ.
DATE : 3 rd September, 2013.
1) Heard. Learned APP says on 21st December, 2010
already charge sheet is filed.
2) Mr.Nagargoje, on instructions, withdraws
Criminal Application to initiate/file
appropriate proceedings.
3) Criminal Application No.173/2011 is permitted to be withdrawn. Dismissed as withdrawn.(A.I.S.CHEEMA) (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE JUDGE
bdv/
Laxman Sadashiv Savai
The State of Maharashtra and/or Others
K.U.Chandiwala
A.I.Cheema
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court