The criminal application was dismissed as withdrawn by the State counsel, on instructions, on the ground that the complaint had become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cran778.11
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 778 OF 2011
Subhash Gyandeo Dame and others ...Applicants versus The State of Maharashtra and another ...Respondents
Mr. V.P. Raje, advocate for the applicants Mr. K.G. Patil, A.P.P. for respondent No.1
CORAM : K. U. CHANDIWAL AND A. I. S. CHEEMA, JJ. DATED : 4th SEPTEMBER, 2013
PER COURT :-
rlj/
K. U. CHANDIWAL
A. I. S. CHEEMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
