In a criminal writ petition, the petitioner withdrew the petition on instructions. The court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, kept all points open, and directed a Learned Judge to consider the age of parties.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; all points kept open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp-1197-12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
rpa
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1197 OF 2012
Anant Shivrao Nadkarni .. Petitioner Vs. FOUR-D Controls Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. .. Respondents
Mr. S.S. Kanetkar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. S. A. Ahmed, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Ms. Shilpa Gajare Dhumal, A.P.P. for Respondent No.2 – State.
CORAM : K. U. CHANDIWAL, J.
DATED : DECEMBER 4, 2013.
P.C. :
Heard Mr. Kanetkar. On instructions, he withdraws
the criminal writ petition. Permitted. Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. All points between the parties are kept open.
2 Learned Judge to consider age of respective parties while dealing with the matter.
(K. U. CHANDIWAL, J.)
1/1
Anant Shivrao Nadkarni
FOUR-D Controls Pvt. Ltd.
State
K. U. CHANDIWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
