In Criminal Applications (APL) 1186/2012, petitioner Milind Bhargav Chitale questioned crimes registered against him. On instructions, counsel withdrew the applications, which the court dismissed as withdrawn while keeping all points open without expressing an opinion on merits.
Criminal applications dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
apl1186-1187-12.sxw
1/2
Pvr
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO.1186 OF 2012
Milind Bhargav Chitale. …Petitioner/Applicant versus 1.State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents AND
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO.1187 OF 2012
Pradip Narayan Gayaval. …Petitioner/Applicant versus 1.State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents
Mr.S.V.Marwadi i/b.Mr.M.D.Mali & Co., for Petitioners/applicants in both the applications.
Ms.Shilpa Gajare-Dhumal, APP for State-Respondent no.1.
--- CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATED : 3rd DECEMBER, 2013
P.C. :
Heard learned Counsel Mr.S.V.Marwadi for applicants/petitioners
extensively.
registered against the respective petitioners/applicants are questioned.
Mr.S.V.Marwadi for applicants/petitioners, on instructions of respective
2/2
Pvr
apl1186-1187-12.sxw
applicants/petitioners who are present in Court, withdraws the criminal applications. Permitted. Dismissed as withdrawn.
Milind Bhargav Chitale
Pradip Narayan Gayaval
State of Maharashtra
K.U.CHANDIWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
