The High Court recalled an order dismissing Criminal Application No. 1086 of 2012 due to the advocate's absence, allowing the application on the applicant bearing court costs.
Criminal Application allowed on the applicant paying costs of Rs 2,000 to HCLS.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
appp-496-13
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
rpa
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 496 OF 2013 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1086 OF 2012
Subhash Devidas Pande & Anr. .. Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
Mr. Ranjeet Patil i/b. Deepak Girme, Advocate for the Applicants.
Mrs. Shilpa Gajare Dhumal, A.P.P. for Respondent – State.
CORAM : K. U. CHANDIWAL, J.
DATED : DECEMBER 4, 2013.
P.C. :
Leave to amend.
due to absence of advocate on 22nd March, 2013, is sought to be recalled, as when the matter was called advocate was unaware
and could not keep tack on the same. Considering the reasons assigned, the order is recalled on the applicant paying costs of
Rs.2,000/- (Rs. Two Thousand only) with High Court Legal
1/2
appp-496-13
Services Committee at Mumbai up to 20th December, 2013. Criminal Application is allowed on the above terms.
(K. U. CHANDIWAL, J.)
2/2
The State of Maharashtra
K. U. CHANDIWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
