Actal v. India Infoline Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
During hearing of a Notice of Motion regarding an admitted appeal in an arbitration matter, the High Court deferred listing for admission to a specified future date after excusing the filing delay.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NMA77-8.7
1/1
PNP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.77 OF 2013 IN APPEAL (LODG.) NO.31 OF 2013 IN
ARBITRATION PETITION NO.449 OF 2012
ACTAL
..Appellant.
versus
India Infoline Ltd.
..Respondent.
Mr. Prathamesh Kamat i/b Mr. Kushal Mor for the Appellant. Mr. Kunal Parekh i/b Thakore Jariwala & Associates for the Respondent.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
ACTAL
- respondent
India Infoline Ltd.
Coram
DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Shri. Prafulla Taware Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Urban Development Dept and Ors.
Shakil Ahmed Amjed Ali and Anr. Vs Malegaon Municipal Corporation and Ors.
Mr. Popat Maruti Theurkar Vs State of Maharashtra, through Principal Secretary, Revenue and Forest Dept and Ors.
Louella Fernandes W/O Wilson Vs Rajan Giridharilal Chawla