The court granted a notice of motion to condone a delay of 613 days in filing an appeal, accepting the explanation provided in the support affidavit.
Notice of motion made absolute to condone delay in filing appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NMA411-8.7
1/1
PNP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.411 OF 2011 IN APPEAL (LODG.) NO.309 OF 2010 IN CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1021 OF 2008 IN SUIT NO.1173 OF 2005
Dy. Salt Commissioner and others
..Appellants.
versus
Gordhandas S. Garodia and others
..Respondents.
Mr. S.R. Rajguru with Mr. A.R. Varma and Mr. Vaibhav Mehta i/b Vaibhav Mehta and Associates for the Appellants.
Mr. P.D. Gandhy i/b Maneksha & Sethna for Respondents 1 and 2. Mr. H.C. Pimple for the BMC.
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, AND S.C.GUPTE, JJ.
8 July 2013.
P.C. :
There is a delay of 613 days in filing the Appeal against the order of the Learned Single Judge dated 30 August 2008. The delay has been satisfactorily explained in the affidavit in support. Accordingly, the Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
(Dr. D.Y.Chandrachud, J.)
(S.C. Gupte, J.)
Dy. Salt Commissioner and others
Gordhandas S. Garodia and others
D.Y.Chandrachud
S.C.Gupte
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
