Entered an order on appeal (lodging) regarding a notice of motion. The court noted a forty-two day delay but held it was satisfactorily explained in the affidavit, thereby granting the prayer to make the motion absolute.
Motion made absolute as the delay was satisfactorily explained.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NMA162-8.7
1/1
PNP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.162 OF 2013 IN APPEAL (LODG.) NO.40 OF 2013 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1438 OF 2011 IN
SUIT NO.1037 OF 2013
Mana Builders and Developers Pvt. Ltd and others
versus Firdous Park CHS Ltd. And others
..Appellants.
..Respondents.
Mr. Ashraf Diamondwala i/b M/s. Diamondwala & Co. for the Appellants. Mr. Mayur Khandeparkar with Ms. Jinal Gogri and Mr. Tushar Ingale i/b Maniar Srivastava & Associates for the Respondents.
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, AND S.C.GUPTE, JJ.
8 July 2013.
P.C. :
There is a delay of forty two days in filing the Appeal which has been satisfactorily explained in the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion. The Motion is hence made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
(Dr. D.Y.Chandrachud, J.)
(S.C. Gupte, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the appeal is satisfactorily explained justifying the appeal notice to be made absolute.
Mana Builders and Developers Pvt. Ltd
Firdous Park CHS Ltd.
D.Y. Chandrachud
S.C. Gupte
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
