The High Court, in a Notice of Motion, condoned a delay of thirty-eight days in filing an Appeal against an Arbitration Petition judgment. The court found no want of good faith and made the motion absolute.
The Notice of Motion was made absolute; appeal delay was condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
nma 1996-2011
1/1
sat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1996 OF 2011 IN APPEAL (LODGING) NO. 415 OF 2011 IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 895 OF 2009
Mr. Nitin Goel ..Applicant/ Appellant
versus Networth Stock Broking Ltd. and Ors. ..Respondents
Ms.Shilpa Kapil for the Applicant.
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, AND S.C. GUPTE, JJ.
22 JULY 2013.
P.C. :
There is a delay of thirty-eight days in filing the Appeal against the
judgment of the learned Single Judge. Having regard to the cause shown, we find that this is not a case of inaction or want of good faith. In the interests of justice, we condone the delay and make the Motion absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
(Dr. D.Y.Chandrachud, J.)
(S.C. Gupte, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of thirty-eight days in filing an Appeal should be condoned.
D.Y. Chandrachud
S.C. Gupte
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
