Disposed
Panna Atmaram Bhansali. v. Tinoo M. Bhansali and Anr.
Bombay HCCHS/131/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CHS131-18.7
1/1
PNP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.131 OF 2013 IN APPEAL NO.675 OF 2012 IN
TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO.44 OF 1983 IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.37 OF 1982
Panna Atmaram Bhansali ..Appellant. versus Tinoo Mansen Bhansali ..Respondent. and Sanjay Atmaram Bhansali ..Applicant.
..Respondent.
Mr. J.P. Sen with Mr. Rohan Cama i/b Dastur Dadhich & Kalambi for the Appellant/ Applicant.
Mr. R.C. Shah with Ms. Geeta Shastri for the Respondent.
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, AND S.C.GUPTE, JJ.
18 July 2013.
P.C. :
Counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicant seeks leave to withdraw the Chamber Summons. The Chamber Summons is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Dr. D.Y.Chandrachud, J.)
(S.C. Gupte, J.)
Panna Atmaram Bhansali
Tinoo Mansen Bhansali
Sanjay Atmaram Bhansali
Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud
S.C. Gupte
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court