IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
Motion for condonation of delay condoned; appeal admitted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NMA2430-18.7
1/1
PNP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2430 OF 2012 IN APPEAL (LODG.) NO.769 OF 2012 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1510 OF 2012 IN SUIT NO.953 OF 2009
Adi Soli Bharucha and others versus
Persepolis Estates Pvt. Ltd. and others
..Appellants.
..Respondents.
Mr. Niranjan Waghela i/b Pandya & Co. for the Appellants. Mr. Roop M. Vasudeo for the Respondents.
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, AND S.C.GUPTE, JJ.
18 July 2013.
P.C. :
There is a delay of thirteen days in filling the Appeal which is satisfactorily explained. The Motion for condonation is not opposed. Hence, the Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a)
(Dr. D.Y.Chandrachud, J.)
(S.C. Gupte, J.)
Adi Soli Bharucha and others
Persepolis Estates Pvt. Ltd. and others
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
S.C. GUPTE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
