In this Company Petition, the High Court of Bombay disposed of the matter on the basis of a consensual settlement executed by the parties, taking the consent terms on record and concluding the proceedings.
Consent terms taken on record and petition disposed of in terms thereof.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S.H.HADAP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY PETITION NO.439 OF 2012
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. .. Petitioner V/s. M/s.Bombay Gypsum Pvt.Ltd. .. Respondent
.. Respondent
Mr.Mangesh M.D.Patel for the petitioner.
Mr.Rajesh P. Khobragade i/by Ms.Poonam Utekar for Respondent. Mr.Sanjay Gurav, Manager of the petitioner present. Mr.Hitesh Joshi, authorised representative of Respondent present.
CORAM :- N.M.JAMDAR ,J. DATE :- 23rd January, 2013
P.C.
The learned counsels for the parties state that the parties have amicably resolved the dispute and have executed the consent terms which have been signed by the parties and their Advocates. The learned counsels pray that the consent terms be taken on record and the petition be disposed of in terms of the consent terms.
(N.M.JAMDAR, J.)
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.
M/s.Bombay Gypsum Pvt.Ltd.
N.M.JAMDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
