The petitioner failed to appear after a notice to appear for dismissal was sent. The learned Single Judge dismissed the company petition for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CP 385/2012
1
S.H.HADAP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY PETITION NO.385 OF 2012
M/s.Kolkata Radiant Properties Pvt.Ltd.
.. Petitioner
V/s.
Petron Engineering Construction Ltd.
.. Respondent
Mr.A.S.Gautama i/by MDP & Partners for the Respondent.
CORAM :- N.M.JAMDAR ,J. DATE :- 23rd January, 2013
P.C.
“The petition was kept today for dismissal as none had appeared on behalf of the petitioner on the earlier date of hearing. The learned counsel for the respondent is present. A request is made on behalf learned counsel for the petitioner by his registered clerk, for adjournment.
1/2
2 CP 385/2012
(N.M.JAMDAR, J.)
2/2
M/s.Kolkata Radiant Properties Pvt.Ltd.
Petron Engineering Construction Ltd.
N.M.Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
