Disposal of a company petition via consent terms on an amicable settlement between the petitioner and the respondent company.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CP254-12
Sequeira
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY PETITION NO. 254 OF 2012
Ashok M. Bajaj. .. Petitioner Vs Twilight Litaka Pharma Pvt. Ltd. .. Respondent
Miss Kavita S.Lalwani, for petitioner. Mr.Ashok M.Bajaj, petitioner present in person. Mr. Sandeep A.Bhagwat a/w Mr.S.S.Kumbhar, for respondent. Mr.Gopal Ramoorti, Managing Director of respondent present.
CORAM: N.M.JAMDAR, J. Monday 21 January, 2013
P.C.:
The learned counsel for the parties state that the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement and they have executed consent terms which have been signed by both the parties and their advocates. The learned counsel pray that the matter be disposed of in terms of the consent terms. Accordingly, the consent terms are taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. The petition is disposed of in terms of consent terms.
N.M.JAMDAR, J.
Ashok M. Bajaj
Twilight Litaka Pharma Pvt. Ltd.
N.M.JAMDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
