This single-line order rejected a civil application by an applicant-appellant seeking a direction to deposit awarded money, noting the execution is not stayed.
null
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CAF882.2013
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
Civil Application (F) No. 882 of 2013 IN First Appeal No. 969 of 2010
Bhupendra S/o Ramdhan Pawar
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra and others
Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's Orders.
Court's or Judge's orders.
Shri. V. K. Paliwal, Advocate for applicant Shri. T. R. Kankale, AGP for respondent Nos. 1 to 4 Shri. S. G. Jagtap, Advocate for respondent No. 5
CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & A. S. CHANDURKAR, JJ. DATED : JULY 23, 2013.
Applicant-Appellant, who has filed execution proceedings, has moved this application. Prayer is to direct respondent-Acquiring Body to deposit the awarded amount. The execution is not stayed by this Court. In this situation, it is open to applicant to proceed further in the matter before executing Court in accordance with law.
Application is thus rejected.
JUDGE JUDGE
Punde
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bhupendra S/o Ramdhan Pawar
The State of Maharashtra
others
B. P. Dharmadikari
A. S. Chandurkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
