Allowed

Shivaji Raosaheb Hambarde v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC25 Sept 2013APPLN/4670/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court minced matters prohibiting certain bail conditions on four accused persons. It agreed to remove the ban on entering the Nanded district. The court upheld the prohibition against influencing witnesses and committing criminal acts, while requiring registration of attendance and submission of new addresses within fifteen days.

What did the court decide?

The condition to keep away from Nanded district was relaxed. Applicants directed to register with Nanded Rural Police Station and furnish new address details within fifteen days. They must not threate

Shivaji Raosaheb Hambarde Vs the State of Maharashtra — Bail and Remand | Bombay HC (2013)

¶1

1 CR.APLN.NOS.4206, 4670, 4672 of 2013

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4206 OF 2013
(in Cri.Application nos.1679 & 2262/2013)

¶4

1.Prashant s/o Keshavrao Hambarde,
Age 20 years, Occu: Education,
r/o Vishnupuri, Nanded,
Tq. & Dist. Nanded.

¶5

2.Raju s/o Ramrao Hambarde,
Age 20 years, Occu: Education,
r/o Vishnupuri, Nanded
Tq. & Dist. Nanded.

¶6

...PETITIONERS

¶7

(Orig.Accused)

¶8

VERSUS

¶9

The State of Maharashtra.

¶10

...RESPONDENT

¶11

...

¶12

Mr. Ashish B.Shinde, Adv., for the petitioners.
Mr.K.G.Patil, APP for respondent State.

¶13

...

¶14

WITH

¶15

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4670 OF 2013 IN APPLN/1666/2013

¶16

Shivaji Raosaheb Hambarde,
Age 37 years, Occu: Business
r/o Vishnupuri,
Tal. & Dist. Nanded.

¶17

(Presently residing at village Hatta,
Tal. & Dist. Hingoli)

¶18

...APPLICANT

¶19

VERSUS

¶20

State of Maharashtra,
Through Police Station Officer,
Rural Police Station, Nanded,
Dist.Nanded....RESPONDENT

¶21

2 CR.APLN.NOS.4206, 4670, 4672 of 2013

¶22

Mr. Satyajit S.Bora, Adv., for the petitioner.
Mr. K.G.Patil, APP for respondent State.

¶23

...

¶24

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4672/2013
IN CRIMINAL APPLN.No.2692/2013

¶25

Shahaji Raosaheb Hambarde,
Age 34 years, Occu: Service,
r/o Vishnupuri,
Tal. & Dist. Nanded.

¶26

(Presently residing at village Hatta
Tal. & Dist. Hingoli)

¶27

VS.

¶28

State of Maharashtra
Through Police Station Officer,
Rural Police Station, Nanded,
Dist. Nanded.

¶29

...RESPONDENT

¶30

...

¶31

Mr. Satyajit S.Bora, Adv., for the applicant.
Mr. K.G.Patil, APP for respondent State.

¶32

...

¶33

CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J.
Dated: September 25, 2013

¶34

...

¶35

PER COURT :-

¶36

1.Heard Mr. Shinde, Mr. Bora and learned
A.P.P. in respective applications.

¶37

2.A report is received from Police Inspector,
Police Station, Nanded ( Rural ).

¶38

3.By orders dated 19th June, 2013 (of
Shahaji), April 30th, 2013, while releasing on bail
the applicants Prashant, Shivaji and Raju were

¶39

3 CR.APLN.NOS.4206, 4670, 4672 of 2013

¶40

directed to keep themselves away from Nanded district
till conclusion of the trial. For that purpose,
exemption was granted.

¶41

4.Learned A.P.P. informs, there is no overt
act or any criminal activities noticed by the
investigator concerning these applicants. Prashant
and Raju are students. Shivaji is engaged in business
activities. Shahaji is presently unemployed, however,
no other criminal antecedents.

¶42

5.Considering the difficulties indicated in
respective applications, and no objection from the
investigator, the condition not to enter in Nanded
district is relaxed. However, the applicants shall
not exert threats to the witnesses and shall not
indulge in any criminal activities. If any breach is
committed, needless to indicate, they are bound to
face music of such situation.

¶43

Respective Applications allowed.

¶44

The attendance to continue, however, the
attendance is to be recorded with Nanded Rural Police
Station.

¶45

The applicants shall furnish their now
changed address with contact telephone / mobile
numbers to the investigator within fifteen days.

¶46

agp/4206-13crapl

Shivaji Raosaheb Hambarde v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shivaji Raosaheb Hambarde v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri N C Patil Chairman Shri Deopur Vidhayak Saitee Dhule and Ors. Vs Punamchand Eknath Bhairav and Anr.

Ganesh Mokinda Patole and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra

Sagar Pappu Awasarkar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Subhash Suryabhan Pawar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Prashant Keshavrao Hambarde and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra

Satish Pralhad Nemade Vs Raymond Company Ltd. Jalgaon and Ors.