Applicants withdrew an application to facilitate a discharge petition; the court permitted withdrawal and disposed of both applications without expressing an opinion on merits.
Withdrawal of application permitted; applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cran246.13
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 246 OF 2013 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4785 OF 2013
Sayyed Naviduzzama Sayyed Fakruzzama and Ors ...Applicants
versus
The State of Maharashtra and others ...Respondents
Mr. Patel Shaikh Ashpak Taher, advocate for the applicants Mr. S.G. Nandedkar, A.P.P. for respondents Nos. 1 and 3
CORAM : K. U. CHANDIWAL AND A. I. S. CHEEMA, JJ. DATED : 19th SEPTEMBER, 2013
PER COURT :-
(A.I.S. CHEEMA, J.) ( K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. )
rlj/
cran246.13
-2-
Sayyed Naviduzzama Sayyed Fakruzzama and Ors
The State of Maharashtra and others
K. U. CHANDIWAL
A. I. S. CHEEMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
