Dismissed
Ayub Noormohammed Sayyed v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCAPL/521/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
apl521-13.sxw
1/2
Pvr
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.521 OF 2013
Ayub Noormohammed Sayyed. …Applicant versus 1.State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents
Ms.B.Sharada, for Applicant.
Mr.S.S.Pednekar, APP for Respondent no.1-State.
CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.
DATED : 2nd July, 2013
P.C. :
Heard.
apl521-13.sxw
2/2
Pvr
2 issues framed by the court
Whether applications seeking production of documents and investigation direction were maintainable given the accused's denial of the power of attorney.
Whether the High Court should interfere in the rejection of applications regarding a falsely alleged power of attorney when conflicting findings exist.
Ayub Noormohammed Sayyed
State of Maharashtra
K.U.CHANDIWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court