The applicant sought withdrawal of pending criminal revision applications Nos.40/2013 and 41/2013 following an order in other revision applications Nos.81/2013 and 82/2013. The court permitted the withdrawal and disposed of the applications.
Withdrawal of Criminal Revision Applications No.40 of 2013 and No.41 of 2013 permitted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
revn40-41-13
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
rpa
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.40 OF 2013 WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.41 OF 2013
Suresh R. Shetty .. Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
Mr. U. V. Singh, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. D. P. Adsule, A.P.P. for Respondent – State.
CORAM : K. U. CHANDIWAL, J.
DATED : JULY 1, 2013.
P.C. :
Heard the learned counsel for the applicant. On instructions he wants to withdraw the applications in view of the order passed in criminal revision application Nos.81 of 2013 and 82 of 2013. Permitted. Revision applications are disposed of.
(K. U. CHANDIWAL, J.)
1/1
Suresh R. Shetty
The State of Maharashtra
K. U. CHANDIWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
