The criminal application was dismissed as withdrawn by the applicant's counsel on instructions, with no order as to costs and no adverse finding recorded against the applicant.
Application dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Ladda
25-apl-48-13.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 48 of 2013
Mrs Hita @ Shivanni Ahluwalia ..Applicant. Vs
The State of Maharashtra & 2 ors
..Respondents.
Mr Udaipuri, Advocate, for the Applicant.
Mr Diwakar Singh a/with Mr Mihir Gheewala for Respondent No.2.
Mr A.S. Gadkari, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
CORAM :- P.V. HARDAS &
A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATED:10th APRIL, 2013.
P. C. :-
(1) After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the applicant states on instructions that the applicant may be permitted to withdraw this application.
(2) Application is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. It is needless to mention that withdrawal of this application would not amount to this Court regarding any finding against the applicant.
(A.R. JOSHI, J) (P.V.HARDAS, J)
1/1
Mrs Hita @ Shivanni Ahluwalia
The State of Maharashtra
P.V. Hardas
A.R. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
