An applicant accused of serious offenses challenged the rejection of his bail application. The court dismissed the application, refusing release due to the pendency of multiple serious cases and the earlier rejection of similar relief, while expediting the appeal hearing.
Application dismissed; no bail or suspension of sentence granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
cri-appa-152-13
pdp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 152 OF 2013 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 12 OF 2012
Somnath Saiyaji Gaikwad
.. Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra
.. Respondent
Mr. Debajyoti Talukdar for applicant. Dr. F. R. Shaikh, APP for State.
CORAM: P. V. HARDAS & A. R. JOSHI, JJ.
APRIL 09, 2013.
P.C.
2
cri-appa-152-13
application filed by Farooq, rejected the application filed by the present applicant on the ground that the applicant was involved in various serious offences punishable under Sections 302, 307, 326 etc. of IPC and the court, therefore, expressed its disinclination to release the applicant on bail.
3
cri-appa-152-13
(A. R. JOSHI,J.) (P. V. HARDAS,J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to release on bail or suspension of sentence pending the decision of the criminal appeal.
Whether the pendency of serious charges against the applicant warrants rejection of his bail application.
Somnath Saiyaji Gaikwad
State of Maharashtra
P. V. Hardas
A. R. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
