This one-line order notes the petitioner's absence in person and the disposal of the writ petition following perusal of a report from the Judicial Magistrate.
The writ petition is disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 Cri.W.P. 93 of 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
Criminal Writ Petition No.93 of 2012
Namdeo Ramchandra Kadupatil. .. Petitioner.
Versus
Santosh Balasaheb Lambe & Others. .. Respondents.
Shri. S.D. Kaldate, Additional Public Prosecutor, for respondent-State.
CORAM: NARESH H PATIL &
T.V. NALAWADE, JJ.
DATE 21st MARCH 2012 PER COURT :
Sd/- Sd/- (T.V. NALAWADE, J.) (NARESH H PATIL, J.) rsl
Namdeo Ramchandra Kadupatil
Santosh Balasaheb Lambe
NARESH H PATIL
T.V. NALAWADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
