The High Court disposed of the writ petition challenging a show cause notice issued by the Deputy Commissioner of Police, directing authorities to pass orders after hearing the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 Cri.W.P. 101 of 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
Criminal Writ Petition No.101 of 2012
Rajesh s/o Arvind Pande. .. Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Another. .. Respondents.
Shri. Nitin T. Tribhuwan, Advocate, with Shri. Ravindra V. Gore, Advocate, for petitioner.
Smt. V.A. Shinde, Additional Public Prosecutor, for respondent Nos.1 and 2.
CORAM: NARESH H PATIL & T.V. NALAWADE, JJ.
DATE 21st MARCH 2012
PER COURT :
(HQs) Aurangabad is challenged. The petitioner has
submitted reply to the authorities. We expect the authorities to pass appropriate orders on the show cause notice after considering the record and after hearing the
2 Cri.W.P. 101 of 2012
petitioner, if the authorities so desire. The order be passed strictly in accordance with law. We have not expressed any opinion in the matter at this stage.
Sd/- Sd/- (T.V. NALAWADE, J.) (NARESH H PATIL, J.)
rsl
Rajesh s/o Arvind Pande
The State of Maharashtra
Another
NARESH H PATIL
T.V. NALAWADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
