The High Court bench at Aurangabad disposed of Civil Application No.2131 of 2012 stating there was no reason to modify the earlier order dated 16th September 2011. No substantive facts other than procedural statement are provided in this order text.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
Civil Application No.2131 of 2012 In Civil ApplicationNo.7508 of 2011 In Writ Petition No.6829 Of 2008
DISTRICT:JALNA
| Office Notes, Memoranda of appearances, orders or directio Registrar’s orders. |
Office Coram, Court’s ns and |
Court’s or Judge’s order |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Hemant Surve, Advocate, for applicant. | ||
| Mr. P.K. Joshi, Advocate, for respondent No.1. ----------- |
||
| Coram: NARESH H PATIL & T.V. NALAWADE, JJ. |
||
| Date: 21stMarch 2012 | ||
| ------------- | ||
| 1) Heard. |
||
| 2) Perused the order dated 16thSeptember 2011 in Civil Application No.7508 of 2011. We do not find any reason to modify the said order. The Civil Application No.2131 of 2012 is disposed of. |
||
| rsl | Sd/- Sd/- (T.V. NALAWADE, J.) ( NARESH H PATIL, J.) |
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the impugned order dated 16th September 2011 requires modification in the present civil application?
Whether Civil Application No.2131 of 2012 requires disposal?
applicant
respondent No.1
NARESH H PATIL
T.V. NALAWADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
