This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.1169 OF 2012
Madhukar Chandra Sha Limbare ..PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Mah. & ors.
..RESPONDENTS
Mr S.R. Sapkal, Advocate holding for Mr Jiwan J. Patil for the petitioner;
Mr K.M. Suryawanshi, A.G.P. for respondent no.1; Mr S.T. Shelke, Advocate for respondent no.2
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND
SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, JJ.
DATE : 14th February, 2012
PER COURT :
Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the subsequent events, the petition is rendered infructuous. Petition stands disposed of as such.
(SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.)
(B.R. GAVAI, J.)
amj/wp1169.12
Madhukar Chandra Sha Limbare
The State of Mah.
B.R. GAVAI
SUNIL P. DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
