Petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition with all issues kept open. The court disposed of the petition as withdrawn without deciding substantive contentions.
Petition withdrawn with all issues and contentions kept open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp.5982.2010.doc
dik
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 5982 OF 2010
Dattajirao Narsingrao Sarnobat ..Petitioner
Vs.
State of Maharashtra and Anr. ..Respondents
Mr.A.B.Borkar for the petitioner. Mr. A.I.Patel, AGP for the respondents.
CORAM : D.D.SINHA AND SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J J.
DATE : OCTOMBER 19, 2012.
P.C.:
Heard. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks
permission to withdraw this petition and prayed that issues
and contentions raised in this petition be kept open. Considered the submissions. Writ Petition is disposed of as
withdrawn by keeping all the issues and contentions open.
[ SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [ D.D.SINHA, J. ]
/kukIik dks”Vh
Pg 1 of 1
Dattajirao Narsingrao Sarnobat
State of Maharashtra
D.D. SINHA
V.K. TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
