Disposed
Vishwas Arjunrao Barbole and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCWP/5875/2010
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Tuesday,12.7.2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Tuesday,12.7.2016
Rane
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 5875 OF 2010
Shri. Baban Kashinath Sarode …..Petitioner
V/s.
Shri. Maruti Kashinath Sarode and Ors. …..Respondents
Mr. Dilip Bodake, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Jaydeep Deo, Advocate for respondents no.1 and 3.
Mrs. V.S. Nimbalkar, AGP for respondents no.7 to 9.
CORAM :- SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J. DATED :- 12TH JULY, 2016.
P.C. :-
1). Mentioned. Not on board. Taken on board at the
instance of the petitioner. The ad-interim orders are extended for a period of 4 weeks from today i.e. until 9th August, 2016.
(SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J)
Shri. Baban Kashinath Sarode
Shri. Maruti Kashinath Sarode and Ors.
R.p. Sondurbaldota
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court