Essential order allowing withdrawal of Civil Writ Petition No. 116 of 2012. The court allowed the petition to be withdrawn. No substantial legal principle is laid down.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP.116.2012.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 116 OF 2012
Alpana Deepak Mali : Petitioner versus Union of India & Ors. : Respondents
Ms. Pooja V. Thorat, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Minoo Siodia, i/b. M/s. Rustamji & Ginwala, for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3.
CORAM:A.M.KHANWILKAR &
R.Y.GANOO,JJ.
DATED:OCTOBER 19, 2012
P.C.:
Upon production, taken on Board.
the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing this Petition. Hence,
allowed to be withdrawn.
(R.Y.GANOO,J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.)
Page 1 of 1
J.V.Salunke,PA
Alpana Deepak Mali
Union of India
A.M.Khanwilkar
R.Y.Ganoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court