Civil Application dismissed by a two-judge bench of the Bombay High Court, directing the underlying writ petition to be listed as per its turn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CAW.2349.2012.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2349 OF 2012 IN CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 5154 OF 2008
Mr. Sanjay Tukaram Koli :- Applicant versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. :- Respondents
Mr. R. K. Mendadkar, for the Applicant.
Mr. V. S. Gokhale, AGP, for Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 4.
CORAM:-A.M.KHANWILKAR &
R.Y.GANOO,JJ.
DATED:-OCTOBER 18, 2012
P.C.:-
No urgency. Application dismissed. Writ Petition be
listed as per its turn as per category.
(R.Y.GANOO,J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.)
Page 1 of 1
J.V.Salunke,PA
Sanjay Tukaram Koli
State of Maharashtra
A.M. Khanwilkar
R.Y. Ganoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court