Petitions filed under Civil Writ Jurisdiction were disposed of immediately on the admission that petitioners had pursued the alternative remedy of an Election Petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP.3927.2012.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 3927 OF 2012
Swati Sanjay Magar & Ors. :- Petitioners versus The Manmad Municipal Council & Ors. :- Respondents
WITHCIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 3928 OF 2012 |
|---|
WITH |
CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 3929 OF 2012 |
WITH |
CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 3930 OF 2012 |
WITHCIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 3959 OF 2012 |
Ms. Pooja Thorat, i/b. Mr. V. M. Thorat, for the Petitioners. Mr. C. R. Sonawane, AGP, for Respondent State.
CORAM:-A.M.KHANWILKAR &
R.Y.GANOO,JJ.
DATED:-OCTOBER 18, 2012
P.C.:-
Counsel for the Petitioners submits that the Petitioners
have resorted to remedy of Election Petition and will not pursue
these Petitions. Accordingly, the Petitions are disposed of leaving
all questions open with liberty to pursue remedy of Election Petition.
(R.Y.GANOO,J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.)
Page 1 of 1
J.V.Salunke,PA
Swati Sanjay Magar & Ors.
The Manmad Municipal Council & Ors.
A.M. Khanwilkar
R.Y. Ganoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court