On an application for amendment permissions to incorporate subsequent developments in a writ petition regarding name change, the High Court of Bombay permitted the amendment without prejudice to the merits, directing filing within two weeks.
Chamber Summons made absolute permitting amendment within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
vss
chsw.181.2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O.O.C.J.
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.181 OF 2012 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2558 OF 2011
Millind Vinod Seth
… Applicant/Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents
Mr.S.J. Panicker for the Petitioner
Ms.Sindha Sridharan, AGP, for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2 Ms.Shyamali Gadre i/b Little & Co. for Resp. No.3
CORAM: A.M. KHANWILKAR &
R.Y. GANOO, JJ.
DATED: 17.10.2012
P.C.:
from amending the present Writ Petition. The amendment can be permitted without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the respondents to agitate the said issue at appropriate stage, which can be
vss 1 of 2
chsw.181.2012
considered on its own merits.
vss 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is permitted to amend the writ petition to incorporate subsequent developments.
Millind Vinod Seth
The State of Maharashtra
Ors.
A.M. KHANWILKAR
R.Y. GANOO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
