Petitioner was permitted to withdraw the writ petition; dismissal recorded as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2908wp380.10
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 380 OF 2010
(Jyoti Nandkishor Ramteke Vs. Union of India & Ors.)
........................................................................................................................................................................ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court orders or directions Court's or Judge's Order and Registrar's orders
Smt Sirpurkar Adv for petitioner. Shri S. K. Mishra ASGI for respondent no. 1.
CORAM: SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK &
SUNIL P. DESHMUKH JJ.
DATED: AUGUST 29, 2012.
Smt. Sirpurkar learned counsel for the petitioner states that
the petitioner is desirous of withdrawing the Writ Petition and an application seeking withdrawal of the petition is filed on record.
On the statement made on behalf of the petitioner, petitioner is permitted to withdraw the petition. Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
JUDGE
JUDGE
svk
Jyoti Nandkishor Ramteke
Union of India
Others
Vasanti A. Naik
Sunil P. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
