High Court at Nagpur dismissed a writ petition filed by a housing cooperative society as it was based on an alternate efficacious remedy available through an appeal.
Petition disposed of with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
288wp3942.11.odt
1/2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
Writ Petition No. 3942 of 2011
Jaivignahartge Gruh Nirman Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit Ngp.
...Versus...
State of Maharashtra & anr.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directio ns and Registrar's orders.
Mr. V.D. Mule Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. S.K. Mishra Advocate for Res. no.2.
CORAM : Smt. Vasanti A. Naik &
Sunil P. Deshmukh, JJ.
DATE : 28.08.2012.
Heard.
The learned counsel for respondent no.2
states that the petitioner has an alternate remedy of approaching the authorities in Appeal against the impugned order and hence this petition may not be entertained.
In view of the alternate efficacious remedy,
288wp3942.11.odt
2/2
the writ petition is disposed of with no order as to costs.
JUDGE JUDGE
/TA/
Jaivignahartge Gruh Nirman Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit Ngp.
State of Maharashtra
Respondent no.2
Vasanti A. Naik
Sunil P. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court