The High Court dismissed a criminal writ petition challenging the rejection of the petitioner's request for extension of furlough, holding that the Deputy Inspector General of Prisons committed no apparent error warranting extraordinary writ jurisdiction.
The criminal writ petition is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 Cri.WP 36 of 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
Criminal Writ Petition No.36 of 2012
Sunil s/o Subhakaran Soni. ... Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Others. ... Respondents.
Smt. Sharda P. Chate, Advocate, appointed for petitioner (Absent).
Smt. V.A. Shinde, Additional Public Prosecutor, for respondents.
CORAM: NARESH H PATIL & T.V. NALAWADE, JJ. DATE 2nd MARCH 2012
PER COURT :
2 Cri.WP 36 of 2012
Sd/- Sd/- (T.V. NALAWADE, J.) (NARESH H PATIL, J.)
rsl
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the request of the petitioner for extension of furlough is maintainable in exercise of extraordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Whether the rejection of the petitioner's request for extension of furlough by the DIG (Prisons) amounts to an apparent error causing interference by this Court.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sunil s/o Subhakaran Soni
The State of Maharashtra
NARESH H PATIL
T.V. NALAWADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
