The single bench disposed of a revision in a prior Criminal Writ Petition allowing furlough. It held that since the Division Bench's directions and the ensuing inquiry were complied with, no further orders were necessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
{1}
Cri.W.P.No.99/2012
drp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.99 OF 2012
Parmanand Dharmdas Meshram PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & others
RESPONDENTS
Mr.R.D.Sanap, Advocate for the petitioner (appointed) Mr.N.R.Shaikh, APP for respondent State
[CORAM : P.V.HARDAS, AND
A.V.POTDAR, J.J.]
DATE : 24th April 2012
PER COURT:
dated 01.03.2012, had allowed the aforesaid criminal writ petition
and has directed the DIG (Prison) to release the petitioner on
Furlough. In addition thereto, the Division Bench had directed the
District Magistrate, Bhandara to conduct an inquiry in respect of
the reasons for non submission of the report to the DIG (Prison), in
time. Pursuant thereto, the District Magistrate, Bhandar has
{2}
Cri.W.P.No.99/2012
conducted an inquiry and has submitted a report stating therein
that there was no deliberate delay in submission of the report. In the light of the fact that the directions of this Court have been
complied with, no further orders are necessary.
[A.V.POTDAR, J.]
[P.V.HARDAS, J.]
drp/A12/cwp99-12
Parmanand Dharmdas Meshram
The State of Maharashtra
P.V.Hardas
A.V.Potdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
