The High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the petitioner's failure in an oral interview for government service. The court accepted the state submission that the petitioner failed the interview, resulting in dismissal without detailed analysis.
The writ petition is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
WRIT PETITION NO. 3443 OF 2012
(Deoyani Vasantrao Nikam VS The State of Maharashtra and anr.)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Mr. A.M. Gholap, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. V.H. Dighe, A.G.P. for the respondent-State
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL &
M.T. JOSHI, JJ.
DATED : 05.09.2012
P.C.:-
Sd/Sd/-
arp
[M.T. JOSHI, J. ] [NARESH H. PATIL, J. ]
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's failure in oral interview justifies dismissal of the writ petition.
DEOYANI VASANTRAO NIKAM
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
NARESH H. PATIL
M.T. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
